ankewehner.de

Digger, my all-time favourite webcomic, finally got out of its “subscribers only apart from the newest page” cover.

As to the comic: It’s epic, the titular character is the only sane person (also wombat) in a somewhat crazy, rich world. I’m also a sucker for black and white art.

Here’s a shortcut to page 1

Speaking of webcomics… I recently got back into Magic: The Gathering (a fantasy-themed collectable card game), and while poking around on their website, I found that they had made some, too, about Planeswalkers… You can ignore “Chandra’s Ultimate”, because it’s repeated as part of Chandra Nalaar: Fuel for the Fire, Part I … That story (all 3 parts together, not only the first) is my favourite on the site.

In Magic lore, Planeswalkers are very powerful magic-users which can travel between planes/dimensions/worlds, and each player of the game is a Planeswalker. The way Wizards of the Coast is pushing that theme lately looks a bit odd to me, because on the table its more of a strategy game with high random factor than anything involving playing a role.

Oh, well, the whole “you are misunderstood and don’t fit in because secretly you are superspecial-magical” apparently can work well for marketing, when you’re aiming at misfit geeky teens*… Look at Spiderman, for example. Bullied goodie two-shoes geek power fantasy to the max.

Lastly, two articles that may be of more general interest I found hidden between the Magic-specific ones:

• Frakkin’ Zounds, about cursing in speculative fiction (nothing terribly exciting, but a nice nudge to think about it if you haven’t yet)
• Tipping the Scales, about ways to make big monsters look big even in tiny images. All those “tricks” of course work for bigger pictures, too, and it looks quite useful to me.

---

* Like I was when I got my first Magic cards. I guess now I’m a slightly less misfit geeky twen.

There is a paragraph from Chris Baty’s book No Plot? No Problem! going round on LJ in meme form.

“Before you sit down to write a novel, you make a list of everything you love to see in novels. When you write your own novel, you should put the stuff from your list in there. Then you should make a second list of everything you hate to see in novels. When you write your own novel, you should make sure none of the stuff from that second list creeps in when you’re tired.”

I’m not immediately planning to write a novel, but anyway…

Likes

• Language that’s fun to read. Banter. A narrator or viewpoint character who doesn’t take things all that seriously. I liked Raymond Chandler’s stuff on that alone, and love it in Discworld, Vlad Taltos, Bartimaeus, Vorkosigan…
• Weird aspects/concepts. It can go too far when the story-world is all out wacky and nothing else, but if it’s just some elements, or the story is somehow else “anchored” so I can relate to it, it’s great. Examples:
  A magic orb circles the Empress of Dragaera. It protects her from harm, enables her subjects to use magic – and also enables them to check the time “telepathically”, and changes colours according to the empress’s mood.
  Skullduggery Pleasant is a sixgun-toting, undead sorcerer detective.
  In The Warrior Apprentice, Miles Vorkosigan builds a space mercenary fleet of respectable size with himself as commander in chief – by accident.
• People I can root for. Being good, at least for a given value of good… For example, so, yeah, Vlad Taltos is a murderer and gangster boss, but he does pay the family of his underling crooks if said underling gets killed in the line of duty… Also, see first Like.
• Well-developed, strong characters who happen to be female are a plus.
• Antagonists I can sympathise with, or whose motivations I can at least intellectually understand. This does not include “being evil is awesome!”
• Friendship. Loyalty. Trust.
• Optimistic basic mood.
  Despite how often I’ve heard them compared, that’s the difference I see between Discworld (“hey, even Death is on our side!”), which I like, and The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (“Humanity sucks, has always sucked and will suck as long as it exists.”), which I did not like at all.
• For fantasy settings including magic (which in itself is a “like”): Creatively used magic. “Whoever can fling the biggest fireball wins” is boring. Oh, and magic used for useful things, too, rather than only destruction.
• A bit of information on how magic works/what rules it follows feeds my inner geek. <3

Dislikes

• “This story mostly exists to carry a MESSAGE!” Worst example I encountered being Lord of the Flies – the version I read had a preface which gave away the ending to explain its symbolic meaning. Disgusting.
• All characters are male, apart from the trophy bride(s) (e.g. Ocean’s Eleven or Lord of the Rings). Or female characters only existing for the benefit of male characters (and/or assumed-to-be-male audience).
  For fantasy races: males are monstrous, or at least unattractive, females attractive by human standards.
• Strictly/overtly patriarchal societies, unless they’re depicted as ridiculous (e.g. in Ethan of Athos) or otherwise criticised in the story. I already live with being considered a second class person, I don’t need to have that shit shoved into my face in my escapism.
• Villains. People who consider themselves evil and are proud of it, and/or are evil because they like being evil… It’s insane or stupid, and on top of that lazy writing in all instances I encountered so far.
• “All X are good, all Y are bad”. Or generally splitting the world into good and bad.
• Doom and gloom and nothing else. For example starting off a story with a list of the hardships a character went through in their life so far will most likely mean I don’t read the rest, unless the tone is un-serious enough to cancel it.
• Male dwarf considers human woman (or elf attractive by human standards) gorgeous. Different species should have different standards of beauty, and I can think of three instances of that particular constellation offhand, making it way over-used for something so stupid.
• “You are the Chosen One of the Prophecy, so you must do this to save the world, even if you have no idea whatsoever about anything.”
• Gushy romance making up most of the story.
• Detailed sex scenes. I really don’t need to know how and how often which tab goes into which slot.
• Sloppy writing and inconsistencies. For instance saying outright and showing through multiple examples throughout the book that technology stops working or breaks as soon as anything magic comes near, but having a major magic ritual accompanied by background music from a CD player. Writing like Wolfgang Hohlbein.

I realise that the “dislikes” list is way longer than the “likes” list. My impression is that I have more relatively specific “hot buttons” that will annoy me, and mostly wide “likes”.

A small addendum to the “all characters are male, apart from the trophy bride(s)” dislike in the case of movies or comics, rather than prose: Men come in a variety of different shapes and ages, but women are all young, slim, “conventionally attractive”, as if made in the same plastic doll mold.

I have less trouble liking a story without any female characters in it (even though that is likely to cause some annoyance, unless the cast is extremely small) than ignoring cardboard-cutout female “characters”, or women inserted for male readers to drool over, or other nonsense like that.

I came across a blog entry, How Often Should You Publish? by a published author, I’d like to comment on. Of course I’m speaking from a reader’s perspective.

The idea that the publishing speed should be right for the fanbase I can see – say, I stopped reading Sluggy Freelance because there was too much too fast being added to for me, but obviously it’s great for enough other people to make it a really popular webcomic.

But as he says in his key assertion, “you don’t publish unless it’s good”, there is objectively publishing too much. My “favourite” example is Wolfgang Hohlbein, a German fantasy author who seems to publish 7 or more books a year. The problem is that the quality suffers. To avoid anything that may have to do with taste, here are some examples.
In one book hailed as “his most ambitious novel”, one of the secondary characters for a few chapters is incorrectly referred to by the name of an entirely different character that died in the prequel. Offhand I remember one other scene which didn’t make sense until I figured out in one sentence he’d used the wrong name of the two characters involved.
Another was a six-part series, and at the end of one book one of the characters was catatonic, and the rhetoric of the other sounded like getting him out of it was the big quest-thing for the next volume, but at the start of that next book the poor sod was just a bit under the weather.
His last book that I gave a chance on one page said “she ran towards the forest, where she could get away since she knew every single tree”, and five pages later “she had never entered the forest, only walked along its edge”.

Re-reading and editing a manuscript before sending it to a publisher certainly is a good idea, even if it takes time.

Turning back to webcomics, the fun part is that there (among amateurs, of course), one piece of advice is to start your first project even if your art and all sucks, because the practise will help you get better, and not doing it means you probably won’t get better.

I should take that to heart.

This books contains Peanuts Snoopy strips dealing with writing, short articles from about 30 authors in which they share experiences or give tips to beginning or wannabe writers. Each of those has only a few pages, sometimes only one, dealing with a limited topic, so the book is good for people with a short attention span, too.

I have no idea how helpful this book is for writing, but it’s certainly fun to read. The comic strips deal with ideas, titles, puns, critics, cover letters, rejections and dark, stormy nights.

And here’s one strip for a teaser: